Nobody gets extra points for confidently answering a question they should have taken to counsel. For Carter Morris, the stronger candidate is usually the one who knows the difference.
“Strong Employment Law Knowledge” Needs a Bit More Detail
It's one of those phrases that finds its way into almost every senior ER brief. Fair enough, but we still need to work out what that looks like in practice.
Are they working alongside in-house employment counsel or expected to be the first port of call themselves? Does the remit cover one market or several? Nobody needs six countries' employment laws committed to memory, but they do need to know when local expertise belongs in the conversation.
That's an important distinction for Carter Morris as an HR employment law recruiter — we're recruiting senior HR people with employment-law responsibility, not practising lawyers.
When Global ER Can't Work the Same Way Everywhere
International ER gets interesting when something the business wants to do globally can't simply be handled the same way in every country.
A restructure may involve different consultation requirements, works councils or employee representative bodies across markets. A global policy may need local adaptation. And sometimes regional teams can handle an issue themselves; sometimes what starts locally needs global involvement.
We'd want examples of where they've had to change the plan for one market or push back on a global approach that wasn't going to work locally.
We'd Look Past the Map
For a genuinely global appointment, we'd also want to understand how that international remit actually worked: